CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Most retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. PipTax is educational and compares costs; it is not investment advice.

Home › Learn › Brokers

Pepperstone vs IG: How to Compare Them Honestly

Updated 14 July 2026 · 7 min read · PipTax education

Split-screen illustration comparing two trading platform dashboards with cost charts

Comparing Pepperstone vs IG properly means looking past headline marketing and checking the things that actually affect your bottom line: regulation, execution, all-in cost, and platform fit. Both are FCA-regulated brokers accessible to UK traders, but "which is better" isn't a single fact — it's a set of criteria you need to check against your own trading style.

This guide walks through exactly what to look at, how to verify it yourself, and why you should never take a "best broker" claim at face value — including this one.

Why Pepperstone vs IG Isn't a Simple Answer

Broker comparisons get reduced to a spread number or a "which is cheaper" headline, but that's misleading. The honest way to compare Pepperstone and IG is criteria by criteria:

A broker can look cheap on one metric and expensive on another. Pepperstone is widely used by MetaTrader and cTrader traders, especially those running EAs. IG has its own long-standing platform plus MetaTrader access and a wide market range. Neither fact tells you which is cheaper for *your* strategy — that requires checking live numbers.

Never rely on a blog claiming one is definitively "best." Verify everything against current data using PipTax's [cost audit tool](/audit.html).

Confirm FCA Regulation First

Before comparing costs, confirm the regulatory basics — they're non-negotiable:

Action step: search each broker's exact legal entity name on the FCA Register (register.fca.org.uk) and confirm it matches the entity you'd actually be signing up with — some brokers operate multiple entities across jurisdictions, and only some serve UK clients under FCA rules.

Don't assume regulatory status from a badge on a homepage. Check the register directly, every time you open or review an account.

Compare Execution Models, Not Just Spreads

How your broker fills orders matters as much as the quoted spread. Two brokers with identical headline spreads can produce very different real-world results depending on execution model:

| Model | How it typically works | What to watch for | |---|---|---| | Market maker / dealing desk | Broker may take the other side of trades internally | Requote risk, potential conflict of interest disclosures | | STP / ECN-style | Orders routed to external liquidity providers | Variable spreads, commission on top, better transparency in fast markets |

Both Pepperstone and IG publish information on their execution approach and order handling — read it on their own sites rather than assuming. Ask specifically:

None of this is fixed forever — execution quality can vary by account type, instrument, and market conditions, so treat published policies as a starting point, not a guarantee.

Calculate All-In Cost, Not Headline Spread

The single biggest mistake traders make when comparing Pepperstone vs IG (or any brokers) is comparing headline spreads in isolation. Your real cost per trade is:

Spread + commission (if any) + overnight swap (if held) = all-in cost

To do this properly:

1. Pick the instrument you actually trade most (e.g. EUR/USD, a major index) 2. Note the account type you'd realistically use on each broker (standard vs raw/commission-based) 3. Pull live spread and commission figures from each broker's own site or platform 4. Add expected swap if you hold overnight — check /rates.html for how swap is calculated and why it varies 5. Run the numbers through [PipTax's cost tool](/audit.html) to see a like-for-like comparison for your trade size and holding period

This is the only fair way to compare cost — a raw-spread account with commission can be cheaper or more expensive than a standard all-in spread account depending on your volume and holding time. There's no universal answer; it depends on your numbers.

Check Platform and EA Support Directly

Platform fit matters as much as cost, especially if you run automated strategies:

Before opening any account, confirm directly on the broker's site:

Platform availability changes over time, so don't rely on old reviews — check the current broker pages and, where relevant, PipTax's [brokers directory](/brokers/index.html) for a structured overview of what each broker currently supports.

Building Your Own Comparison Checklist

Rather than trusting a ranking, build a short checklist you personally verify every time you compare brokers:

PipTax's [methodology page](/methodology.html) explains exactly how our cost tool sources and calculates figures, so you can trust the process rather than a headline number.

Conclusion: Make Pepperstone vs IG a Personal Decision

The honest conclusion to any Pepperstone vs IG comparison is that there's no fixed winner — only a set of criteria that matter differently depending on your strategy, instrument mix, and trading frequency. Both are FCA-regulated, both support MetaTrader in some form, and both publish their own cost and execution information. Your job is to verify those figures against your actual trading pattern rather than accept a generic ranking.

Use [PipTax's cost audit tool](/audit.html) to run a like-for-like comparison with your real numbers, and check the [brokers directory](/brokers/index.html) for a structured overview before opening any live account. Trading involves risk, and no broker comparison changes that — but an honest, criteria-based comparison at least ensures you're not paying more than you need to for the same risk.

Key takeaways

  • Pepperstone vs IG isn't a question with one 'winner' — the right answer depends on your instrument mix, trade frequency, and platform preference
  • Both are FCA-regulated, which caps retail leverage at 30:1 on major FX pairs and gives you access to the Financial Ombudsman Service
  • Compare all-in cost (spread plus commission plus swap), not headline spread alone — use the cost tool with your real trade size and hold time
  • Execution model (market maker vs STP/ECN-style routing) affects slippage and fill quality more than marketing copy suggests
  • Platform and EA support differ: confirm current MetaTrader (MT4/MT5) availability and any proprietary platform directly on each broker's site
  • Re-run the comparison periodically — spreads, swaps and platform offerings change over time
Want the real number for how you trade? Audit your MT4/MT5 statement free — see your true all-in cost and the genuinely cheapest broker for your style.

Frequently asked questions

Is Pepperstone or IG better for beginners?
Neither is universally 'better' — it depends what you value. IG has been established longer and offers a broad range of markets plus its own platform alongside MetaTrader. Pepperstone is well known among MetaTrader and cTrader users, particularly for EA-based trading. Try each broker's demo account and check current costs on /audit.html before deciding.
Are both Pepperstone and IG FCA regulated?
Yes, both are FCA-regulated firms accessible to UK residents. FCA regulation means retail leverage on major FX pairs is capped at 30:1 and you have access to the Financial Ombudsman Service if a dispute arises. Always double-check current regulatory status on the FCA register, since entity structures can change.
Which broker has lower spreads, Pepperstone or IG?
We won't state a fixed number here because spreads move with market conditions, account type and instrument. Use PipTax's cost tool at /audit.html to pull live comparable figures for the specific pairs and sizes you actually trade.
Can I run expert advisors (EAs) on both brokers?
Both support algorithmic trading, but exact platform availability (MT4 vs MT5 vs cTrader) can differ by account type or region. Confirm current platform and EA support directly on Pepperstone's and IG's own sites before committing.
What's the difference between a market maker and STP execution?
A market maker may take the other side of your trade internally, while STP/ECN-style brokers route orders to external liquidity providers. This affects how prices are formed and how slippage behaves in fast markets. Check each broker's order execution policy for specifics.
How often should I re-compare brokers?
At least once or twice a year, or whenever your trading style changes (e.g. moving from swing to scalping). Spreads, swap rates and platform features are not fixed forever, so periodic checks via /audit.html keep your cost assumptions current.

Keep going: Audit Index Methodology Rates